The Electoral College: For or Against

I’ve always thought that members of the electoral college should vote the way of their state’s popular vote or abstain.  Truthfully, I really couldn’t remember much about why it was created in the first place so  I decided to do a little web surfing for some answers…

*The electoral college consists of 538 electors, and of those, a candidate needs 270 votes to become president. Although the Founding Fathers wanted the people to have a say, there was concern that a charismatic tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come into power. Alexander Hamilton briefly addressed these concerns in the Federalist Papers. The idea was that the electors would be a group of people who would ensure that a qualified person would become president.
The first design of the electoral college allowed each state the same number of electors as senators, which was always two, plus the same number of its U.S. Representatives. Each elector met within its own state rather than one large meeting altogether. The founding fathers believed this would prevent bribery, corruption and secret dealings. The candidate with the most electoral votes, provided it was the majority, became president. The candidate with the second most electoral votes became vice president. (Wouldn’t that make for an interesting presidency now?) lasted through the first four presidential elections when the powers that be realized ties were inevitable. The process was changed to include one vote for president and a separate vote for vice president, but still required a majority vote in order for a candidate to take office.

Prior to this election, only four other times did a President win by the electoral college votes but lost in the popular vote:

In 1824, John Quincy Adams
(party affiliation(s) Federalist then Democratic-Republican/forerunner of the Republican) was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson (Democratic-Republican party) was the winner in both categories. Jackson received 38,000 more popular votes than Adams, and beat him in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite his victories, Jackson didn’t reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. In fact, neither candidate did. The decision went to the House of Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House.

In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes (party affiliation(s) Whig, then Republican) won the election (by a margin of one electoral vote), but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel J. Tilden (Democratic)

In 1888, Benjamin Harrison (party affiliation(s) Republican)
received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland’s (Democratic) 168, winning the presidency. But Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes.

In 2000, George W. Bush (party affliation(s) Republican) was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn’t win the popular vote either. Al Gore (Democratic) holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.

*excerpts from Wikipedia

For more interest info (like they don’t officially count the Electoral College votes until January 6, 2017) go to:

https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/roles.html#electors

Re: Faithless Electors

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector

6 thoughts on “The Electoral College: For or Against

  1. Good post sis.. My understanding for the electoral college is basically so a few populous states aren’t the only ones deciding the future of the country by the profit of having a higher population.. That a president is elected by a fair representation of the whole country.. This election is a prime example.. I read that if California’s popular vote were excluded, Trump would win the popular vote.. Perhaps California should have more electoral votes.. However this election is fraught with voter fraud claims from both red and blue sides and now Jill Stein too has called for a recount in 3 swing states.. Her question relies on computer scientists claiming hacking fraud.. But just yesterday the only named scientist has retracted on his claim.. Stein curiously doesn’t see the need to investigate a 3 million illegal immigrant vote claim in California though..

    I find the whole mess a pile of corruption and deceit and that we will be denied the bottom truths of the matter.. I think the only winners are the usual suspects.. The ones who sit at the top of the power pyramid who sit and play chess with live pieces, the world’s population..

    I was reviewing your latest posts after renewing my WP account and I’m so proud of you.. I love the pics, the reblogs, your new recipes (gotta try your lemon cake) and want everyone to know how much I appreciate you here 💛
    I’ll get back to posting and even have a couple of recipes I created but didn’t take pics.. So hopefully I’ll make time soon to make them again and get back to blogging 😕

    Liked by 1 person

    1. On this Thanksgiving, I am, especially, thankful for my sister, a.k.a. Pan, for asking me to help with her blog. It has been great fun to author posts and even more fun to meet and greet, virtually speaking, a wide variety of interesting, intelligent and creative people via WordPress.
      Happy Thanksgiving, Sis, and Happy Days Filled With Love and Good Health To All!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Our forefathers definitely seemed not to trust their fellow Americans. I think the electoral college votes should count only if their is a tie in the popular vote between the top two candidates….guess that is too simplistic of an idea for our government in the 21st century …(insert sigh here)

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I have lived in Italy, Britain and France and of course now here. I would comment only that no electoral system seems entirely to work. I can’t remember a time when there havent been moves to change the first past the post system to proportional representation in England. I thank you for the lesson …. it at least clarifies why the system is as it is!

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s